Numbers 26
Numbers 26 – The Second Census
A. The second census of Israel in the wilderness.
1. (1-4) The command to take the census.
And it came to pass, after the plague, that the LORD spoke to Moses and Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, saying: “Take a census of all the congregation of the children of Israel from twenty years old and above, by their fathers’ houses, all who are able to go to war in Israel.” So Moses and Eleazar the priest spoke with them in the plains of Moab by the Jordan, across from Jericho, saying: “Take a census of the people from twenty years old and above, just as the LORD commanded Moses and the children of Israel who came out of the land of Egypt.”
a. It came to pass, after the plague: The census of Numbers 26 came after the plague of judgment described in the previous chapter. That marked the conclusion of the passing of the generation that would die in the wilderness, with the single exception of Moses, whose death is recorded in Deuteronomy 34. Only two from that generation would not die in the wilderness: Joshua and Caleb.
i. Numbers 26:64-65 makes it clear that the generation of unbelief had passed, that not one remained from that generation.
ii. “The expression ‘after the plague’ is to be regarded as the turning point from the first generation to the second, the shift from the fathers and mothers to sons and daughters. God was about to begin a new work with a new people. The younger generation would begin to have their day.” (Allen)
b. Take a census of all the congregation of the children of Israel: Some 38 years earlier, at the beginning of the book of Numbers, while Israel still camped at Mount Sinai, God commanded them to take a census (Numbers 1-3). This census was carried out by Moses and Eleazar (Numbers 26:63).
i. “By thus taking a census of his people, the Lord showed that he valued each one of them. They were registered by their families and by their names; thus were they personally enrolled in the family book of the living God, and he thus, in effect, said to each one of them, ‘I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine.’” (Spurgeon)
ii. The first census was primarily for military organization. If they were to enter and take possession of the land of Canaan, they had to know how many troops they had, and how they should best be organized.
iii. Numbers 26:52-56 reveals an important second reason for this second census: to help in the fair apportioning of the land of Canaan so that the larger tribes would receive more land.
c. All who are able to go to war in Israel: The purpose of the second census was also made clear. They were to count those able to fight on behalf of Israel. This accounting, 38 years later, was also for military organization.
i. 38 years before Israel was organized enough; they just did not have enough faith to take Canaan. Organization is good, and the work of God can suffer from a lack of it, but even the best organization can never replace bold trust in God.
ii. Numbering those able to go to war meant something different now than it did 38 years previously. “Once, an easy entrance into the land of promise may have been expected; but that dream has long passed away. Now the Israelites are made clearly to understand that the last effort will require the whole warlike energy they can summon, the best courage of every one who can handle sword or spear.” (Watson)
iii. “The wisdom which commanded the counting of Israel at the beginning of the wilderness journey, also determined to count them at the end of it. This would show that he did not value them less than in former years; it would afford proof that his word of judgment had been fulfilled to them; and, moreover, it would marshal them for the grand enterprise of conquering the land of Canaan.” (Spurgeon)
iv. From twenty years old and above, by their fathers’ houses, all who are able to go to war in Israel: Spurgeon took this principle and applied it spiritually to our congregations, wondering how many there are among us who can truly battle in the spirit: “If the numbers of our churches were taken in this fashion, would they not sadly shrink? We have many sick among us that need to be carried about, and nursed, and doctored…. To revise the church rolls so as to leave none but vigorous soldiers on the muster-roll would make us break our hearts over our statistics.”
2. (5-11) The tribe of Reuben.
Reuben was the firstborn of Israel. The children of Reuben were: of Hanoch, the family of the Hanochites; of Pallu, the family of the Palluites; of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites; of Carmi, the family of the Carmites. These are the families of the Reubenites: those who were numbered of them were forty-three thousand seven hundred and thirty. And the son of Pallu was Eliab. The sons of Eliab were Nemuel, Dathan, and Abiram. These are the Dathan and Abiram, representatives of the congregation, who contended against Moses and Aaron in the company of Korah, when they contended against the LORD; and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up together with Korah when that company died, when the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men; and they became a sign. Nevertheless the children of Korah did not die.
a. The children of Reuben were: In the first census, Reuben counted 46,500 men ready for war (Numbers 1:21, 2:11); 38 years later, they counted 43,730 – a loss of 2,770 men (6%).
i. If this census is compared with that given in Numbers 1, the difference is that the first census only gave the total number of men over 20 years of age in each tribe. The second census gives that number, but also the names of the major families or clans that make up each tribe.
b. These are the Dathan and Abiram, representatives of the congregation, who contended against Moses: Notable in the tribe of Reuben were Dathan and Abiram, who were co-leaders with Korah in the rebellion against the LORD and Moses described in Numbers 16. Perhaps one reason Dathan and Abiram resented Moses’ leadership was that they were from the tribe of Israel’s firstborn son (Reuben); yet Moses, who was descended from Levi (a younger son) was the leader of the nation.
i. Who contended against Moses and Aaron…when they contended against the LORD: “Further, the verb translated ‘rebelled’ [contended] against Moses and Aaron is rare, signifying a strong contest of wills. But ultimately they found they were struggling, not just with man, but with God.” (Allen)
ii. And they became a sign: God’s judgment of Dathan, Abiram, Korah and their followers in Numbers 16 surely was a sign, both to the generation in the wilderness and beyond.
iii. “The term employed for ‘sign,’ the Hebrew nes, typically is used to denote an ensign or banner around which people rally (Jeremiah 50:2) or soldiers muster for battle (Jeremiah 50:2)…. But like Sodom and Gomorrah, or Nadab and Abihu, Dathan and Abiram, or Korah, these individuals would serve as historical bywords for how God deals with revolutionaries.” (Cole)
3. (12-14) The tribe of Simeon.
The sons of Simeon according to their families were: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites; of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites; of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites; of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites; of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites. These are the families of the Simeonites: twenty-two thousand two hundred.
a. The sons of Simeon: In the first census, the tribe of Simeon counted 59,300 men ready for war (Numbers 1:23, 2:13); 38 years later, they counted 22,200. This was a staggering loss of 37,100 men for this once-great tribe (a loss of 63%).
i. “It may be that the fall in Reuben and Simeon’s population should be linked with these tribes’ support for Dathan and Abiram (Numbers 16) and Zimri (Numbers 25), but it is hard to identify any factor that would account for the decline of the other tribes.” (Wenham)
4. (15-18) The tribe of Gad.
The sons of Gad according to their families were: of Zephon, the family of the Zephonites; of Haggi, the family of the Haggites; of Shuni, the family of the Shunites; of Ozni, the family of the Oznites; of Eri, the family of the Erites; of Arod, the family of the Arodites; of Areli, the family of the Arelites. These are the families of the sons of Gad according to those who were numbered of them: forty thousand five hundred.
a. The sons of Gad: In the first census, the tribe of Gad counted 45,650 men ready for war (Numbers 1:25, 2:15). 38 years later, they counted 40,500. This was a loss of 5,150 fighting men (11%).
5. (19-22) The tribe of Judah.
The sons of Judah were Er and Onan; and Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan. And the sons of Judah according to their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Parzites; of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites. And the sons of Perez were: of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites; of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites. These are the families of Judah according to those who were numbered of them: seventy-six thousand five hundred.
a. The sons of Judah: In the first census, the tribe of Judah counted 74,600 men ready for war (Numbers 1:27, 2:4). 38 years later, they counted 76,500. This was a gain of 1,900 (3%).
6. (23-25) The tribe of Issachar.
The sons of Issachar according to their families were: of Tola, the family of the Tolaites; of Puah, the family of the Punites; of Jashub, the family of the Jashubites; of Shimron, the family of the Shimronites. These are the families of Issachar according to those who were numbered of them: sixty-four thousand three hundred.
a. The sons of Issachar: In the first census, the tribe of Issachar counted 54,400 men ready for war (Numbers 1:29, 2:6). 38 years later, they counted 64,300. This was a gain of 9,900 (18%).
7. (26-27) The tribe of Zebulun.
The sons of Zebulun according to their families were: of Sered, the family of the Sardites; of Elon, the family of the Elonites; of Jahleel, the family of the Jahleelites. These are the families of the Zebulunites according to those who were numbered of them: sixty thousand five hundred.
a. The sons of Zebulun: In the first census, the tribe of Zebulun counted 57,400 men ready for war (Numbers 1:31, 2:8). 38 years later, they counted 60,500. This was a gain of 3,100 (5%).
8. (28-34) The tribe of Manasseh.
The sons of Joseph according to their families, by Manasseh and Ephraim, were: The sons of Manasseh: of Machir, the family of the Machirites; and Machir begot Gilead; of Gilead, the family of the Gileadites. These are the sons of Gilead: of Jeezer, the family of the Jeezerites; of Helek, the family of the Helekites; of Asriel, the family of the Asrielites; of Shechem, the family of the Shechemites; of Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites; of Hepher, the family of the Hepherites. Now Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters; and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah. These are the families of Manasseh; and those who were numbered of them were fifty-two thousand seven hundred.
a. The sons of Manasseh: In the first census, the tribe of Manasseh counted 32,200 men ready for war (Numbers 1:35, 2:21). 38 years later, they counted 52,700. This was a remarkable gain of 20,500 (64%).
9. (35-37) The tribe of Ephraim.
These are the sons of Ephraim according to their families: of Shuthelah, the family of the Shuthalhites; of Becher, the family of the Bachrites; of Tahan, the family of the Tahanites. And these are the sons of Shuthelah: of Eran, the family of the Eranites. These are the families of the sons of Ephraim according to those who were numbered of them: thirty-two thousand five hundred. These are the sons of Joseph according to their families.
a. These are the sons of Ephraim: In the first census, the tribe of Ephraim counted 40,500 men ready for war (Numbers 1:33, 2:19). 38 years later, they counted 32,500. This was a loss of 8,000 men (20%).
10. (38-41) The tribe of Benjamin.
The sons of Benjamin according to their families were: of Bela, the family of the Belaites; of Ashbel, the family of the Ashbelites; of Ahiram, the family of the Ahiramites; of Shupham, the family of the Shuphamites; of Hupham, the family of the Huphamites. And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites; of Naaman, the family of the Naamites. These are the sons of Benjamin according to their families; and those who were numbered of them were forty-five thousand six hundred.
a. The sons of Benjamin: In the first census, the tribe of Benjamin counted 35,400 men ready for war (Numbers 1:37, 2:23). 38 years later, they counted 45,600. This was a gain of 10,200 men (29%).
11. (42-43) The tribe of Dan.
These are the sons of Dan according to their families: of Shuham, the family of the Shuhamites. These are the families of Dan according to their families. All the families of the Shuhamites, according to those who were numbered of them, were sixty-four thousand four hundred.
a. These are the sons of Dan: In the first census, the tribe of Dan counted 62,700 men ready for war (Numbers 1:39, 2:26). 38 years later, they counted 64,400. This was a gain of 1,700 men (3%).
12. (44-47) The tribe of Asher.
The sons of Asher according to their families were: of Jimna, the family of the Jimnites; of Jesui, the family of the Jesuites; of Beriah, the family of the Beriites. Of the sons of Beriah: of Heber, the family of the Heberites; of Malchiel, the family of the Malchielites. And the name of the daughter of Asher was Serah. These are the families of the sons of Asher according to those who were numbered of them: fifty-three thousand four hundred.
a. The sons of Asher: In the first census, the tribe of Asher counted 41,500 men ready for war (Numbers 1:41, 2:28). 38 years later, they counted 53,400 men. This was a gain of 11,900 (29%).
i. The daughter of Asher was Serah: The mention of Serah, daughter of Asher (Numbers 26:46), is remarkable (and she is mentioned as well in Genesis 46:17 and 1 Chronicles 7:30).” (Allen)
13. (48-50) The tribe of Naphtali.
The sons of Naphtali according to their families were: of Jahzeel, the family of the Jahzeelites; of Guni, the family of the Gunites; of Jezer, the family of the Jezerites; of Shillem, the family of the Shillemites. These are the families of Naphtali according to their families; and those who were numbered of them were forty-five thousand four hundred.
a. The sons of Naphtali: In the first census, the tribe of Naphtali counted 53,400 men ready for war (Numbers 1:43, 2:30). 38 years later, they counted 45,400 men. This was a loss of 8,000 (15%).
14. (51) The total number of men able to go to war among Israel.
These are those who were numbered of the children of Israel: six hundred and one thousand seven hundred and thirty.
a. These are those who were numbered: In the first census, Israel counted 603,550 men ready for war (Numbers 1:46, 2:32). 38 years later, they counted 601,730 men – a loss of 1,820 men (0.3%).
b. Six hundred and one thousand seven hundred and thirty: So, the total number of men ready for war during the wilderness stayed virtually the same over the 38-year period, when the generation of unbelief died in the wilderness.
i. In one respect, we see stagnation. The stagnation of population is reflective of Israel’s spiritual condition during those 38 years. We should have expected them to grow, as is normal in the course of generations. Instead, they simply stayed where they were. The 38 years in the wilderness were years of no growth, no advance – of mere existence until the generation of unbelief had died and a generation of faith had replaced them, a generation that was bold enough to take the Promised Land.
ii. In another respect, we see God’s great mercy and blessing. The wilderness did not kill the people of God. Under God’s blessing and guidance – even accounting for His judgments upon them – they remained strong and vital through an entire generation in a difficult, inhospitable wilderness.
iii. “An inconsequential net decline of only 1,820 (0.3 percent), in spite of physical obstacles, spiritual failures, and harsh judgment from the Lord, confirms that the promise to Abraham of innumerable descendants remains in effect.” (Cole)
iv. “Notwithstanding the amazing increase in some and decrease in other tribes, the same sort of proportion is preserved in the east, west, north, and south divisions, as before.” (Clarke)
c. Numbered of the children of Israel: During this period, certain tribes enjoyed significant gains, and certain tribes suffered significant losses.
i. Of these twelve tribes of Israel, five suffered loss, and seven gained men. Half of the tribes had gains or losses of 15% or less, but Simeon lost 63% of their population, and Manasseh gained 64%. God was blessing or cursing certain tribes, no doubt related to their trust in God and obedience.
Tribes of Israel – First and Second Census (Numbers 1, 3 and 26)
| TRIBE | 1ST CENSUS | 2ND CENSUS | CHANGE | PERCENT |
| Reuben | 46,500 | 43,730 | -2,770 | -6% |
| Simeon | 59,300 | 22,200 | -37,100 | -63% |
| Gad | 45,650 | 40,500 | -5,150 | -11% |
| Judah | 74,600 | 76,500 | +1,900 | +3% |
| Issachar | 54,400 | 64,300 | +9,900 | +18% |
| Zebulun | 57,400 | 60,500 | +3,100 | +5% |
| Manasseh | 32,200 | 52,700 | +20,500 | +64% |
| Ephraim | 40,500 | 32,500 | -8,000 | -20% |
| Benjamin | 35,400 | 45,600 | +10,200 | +29% |
| Dan | 62,700 | 64,400 | +1,700 | +3% |
| Asher | 41,500 | 53,400 | +11,900 | +29% |
| Naphtali | 53,400 | 45,400 | -8,000 | -15% |
| Levi | Not counted | Not counted |
| Total | 603,550 | 601,730 | -1,820 | -0.3% |
B. Inheritance of the land of Canaan.
1. (52-56) The general principle of inheritance: larger tribes receive larger portions of land.
Then the LORD spoke to Moses, saying: “To these the land shall be divided as an inheritance, according to the number of names. To a large tribe you shall give a larger inheritance, and to a small tribe you shall give a smaller inheritance. Each shall be given its inheritance according to those who were numbered of them. But the land shall be divided by lot; they shall inherit according to the names of the tribes of their fathers. According to the lot their inheritance shall be divided between the larger and the smaller.”
a. To a large tribe you shall give a larger inheritance: When Canaan was divided by lot, the lines were to be drawn according to this general principle. Larger tribes received a larger territory because they had more families to divide the land among.
b. According to the lot their inheritance shall be divided: The actual apportioning of land within a territory would be done according to the lot, with the idea that God guided the lot (Proverbs 16:33). The apportioned land would be an inheritance, remaining within the family and not to be permanently sold or transferred.
2. (57-62) The tribe of Levi and their inheritance.
And these are those who were numbered of the Levites according to their families: of Gershon, the family of the Gershonites; of Kohath, the family of the Kohathites; of Merari, the family of the Merarites. These are the families of the Levites: the family of the Libnites, the family of the Hebronites, the family of the Mahlites, the family of the Mushites, and the family of the Korathites. And Kohath begot Amram. The name of Amram’s wife was Jochebed the daughter of Levi, who was born to Levi in Egypt; and to Amram she bore Aaron and Moses and their sister Miriam. To Aaron were born Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar. And Nadab and Abihu died when they offered profane fire before the LORD. Now those who were numbered of them were twenty-three thousand, every male from a month old and above; for they were not numbered among the other children of Israel, because there was no inheritance given to them among the children of Israel.
a. For they were not numbered among the other children of Israel: The Levites were not numbered in either the first or second census, because the men of their tribe were not to go to war.
b. Because there was no inheritance given to them among the children of Israel: A second reason to not count the Levites was that they were to receive no inheritance of land as the other tribes did. Their inheritance was greater than property – the LORD Himself (Numbers 18:20).
3. (63-65) The generation of unbelief had no inheritance.
These are those who were numbered by Moses and Eleazar the priest, who numbered the children of Israel in the plains of Moab by the Jordan, across from Jericho. But among these there was not a man of those who were numbered by Moses and Aaron the priest when they numbered the children of Israel in the Wilderness of Sinai. For the LORD had said of them, “They shall surely die in the wilderness.” So there was not left a man of them, except Caleb the son of Jephunneh and Joshua the son of Nun.
a. But among these there was not a man of those who were numbered by Moses and Aaron: None of those counted in the first census were counted in the second. That was the old generation, the generation of unbelief, who perished in the wilderness. They obviously had no inheritance in the Promised Land (except for Caleb and Joshua).
i. “The census takers, Moses and Eleazar, bridge the generations. Moses has led the people of Israel mightily and valiantly through the Sinai and wilderness experiences, but he will not enter the Promised Land. Instead Eleazar will assume the responsibility of priestly leadership for the new generation.” (Cole)
ii. Except Caleb…and Joshua: “Under the latter [Joshua] this new people of God would enter their inheritance. Through the ministry of a greater Joshua (Jesus is Greek for Joshua), the people of God in every generation are invited to enter into God’s rest (Hebrews 4:1-13).” (Wenham)
b. There was not left a man of them: It is good to take such words as reminders of our own mortality. Just as a generation passed in the wilderness, so we – if Jesus does not return for us first – will pass from this earth to eternity. It is good to soberly consider this and live as one prepared to die.
i. “On each of these unbelieving men the Divine sentence was executed…. Unless Christ come first, our turn will come. In Adam all die. We must all appear before the judgment-seat of Christ. Each was born alone, must die alone, and alone give an account to the King. Prepare, my soul, to meet Him!” (Meyer)
ii. “If we are now serving God, let us do so with intense earnestness, since only for a little while shall we have the opportunity to do so among men…. Live while you live. At the same time, lay plans for influencing the rising generation. Lay yourself out to work while it is called to-day.” (Spurgeon)
